A Microsoft Outlook email forum. Outlook Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Outlook Banter forum » Microsoft Outlook Email Newsgroups » Outlook - Installation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Archive to pst or use ost



 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 19th 06, 10:16 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook.installation
Craig
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 65
Default Archive to pst or use ost

We are a small shop running Windows SBS 2003 and use Exchange in Cached mode
as we work off of laptops often out of the office. Is it best practice to
have individual users archive their Outlook data using pst files or is it
best to keep all data in the ost file? Is a hybrid approach best that keeps
calendars, contacts, tasks and notes in the ost file since this data is
collectively small and use pst archive for mail?

My understanding is that pst files help reduce the ost/Exchange sync time
and server load but it is hard to run auto backups as the pst files are often
open. In addition we have a user whom never empties the deleted items folder
and now has a pst file almost 3GB in size – this can’t be good or maybe I am
unnecessarily concerned. Appreciate your thoughts.

  #2  
Old September 20th 06, 12:51 AM posted to microsoft.public.outlook.installation
neo [mvp outlook]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 293
Default Archive to pst or use ost

Any exchange administrator will tell you that the best place for Outlook
data is on the Exchange server (cached mode/ost). This is because if
anything happens to that laptop, the user isn't up the creek.

As for that user that refuses to empty the deleted items folder, there are
ways around this. (either by using the cleanup wizard on exchange or gpos).
In any event, communicate and educate the user that the "Deleted Items"
folder shouldn't be used as a filing cabinet.

"Craig" wrote in message
...
We are a small shop running Windows SBS 2003 and use Exchange in Cached
mode
as we work off of laptops often out of the office. Is it best practice to
have individual users archive their Outlook data using pst files or is it
best to keep all data in the ost file? Is a hybrid approach best that
keeps
calendars, contacts, tasks and notes in the ost file since this data is
collectively small and use pst archive for mail?

My understanding is that pst files help reduce the ost/Exchange sync time
and server load but it is hard to run auto backups as the pst files are
often
open. In addition we have a user whom never empties the deleted items
folder
and now has a pst file almost 3GB in size - this can't be good or maybe I
am
unnecessarily concerned. Appreciate your thoughts.



 




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
?'s on moving from PST to server/ost MikeMoney Outlook - Installation 1 August 16th 06 11:24 PM
Multiple users archive to the same archive.pst file? Matt Outlook - Installation 3 July 1st 06 04:03 PM
OST vs PST Robert Kufrin Outlook - General Queries 8 May 2nd 06 10:10 PM
ost/pst Mark Outlook - General Queries 3 March 30th 06 10:20 PM
convert ost to pst jeremypcio Outlook - General Queries 0 March 22nd 06 02:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Outlook Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.