![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello,
We just switched from exchange 55 to exchange 2003. All staff have the outlook client. Oneof the things that was happening before our switch was that messages sent internal were not being delivered intantly to the staff persons inbox. In fact, if you opened and existing email, then you would see the inbox updated with messages that hadn't been delivered yet. Can anyone help with this, are there any settings that can bechanged to speed up delivery. Thanks in advance Kerry |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Generally this means that client workstation is not receiving a UDP network
packet from the server to update itself. Since you didn't mention what version of Microsoft Outlook your site is using nor operating system, I would start with the basics of... 1) If running Windows XP with the firewall (any firewall really), to turn it off or create an exemption for the binary Outlook.exe so it can listen for all traffic types. 2) If running an older version of Microsoft Outlook (e.g. Outlook 2002 from Office XP) and you don't want to mess with firewall settings, then you can try the force polling registry edit. Outlook 2000 http://support.microsoft.com/default...304849&sd=RMVP Outlook 2002 http://support.microsoft.com/default...305572&sd=RMVP Outlook 2003 and later doesn't require the registry edit as it has logic to handle this. "Kerry" wrote in message ... Hello, We just switched from exchange 55 to exchange 2003. All staff have the outlook client. Oneof the things that was happening before our switch was that messages sent internal were not being delivered intantly to the staff persons inbox. In fact, if you opened and existing email, then you would see the inbox updated with messages that hadn't been delivered yet. Can anyone help with this, are there any settings that can bechanged to speed up delivery. Thanks in advance Kerry |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi I added the force polling registry key ... will this cause alot of network
traffic if I apply it to 300 machines? "neo [mvp outlook]" wrote: Generally this means that client workstation is not receiving a UDP network packet from the server to update itself. Since you didn't mention what version of Microsoft Outlook your site is using nor operating system, I would start with the basics of... 1) If running Windows XP with the firewall (any firewall really), to turn it off or create an exemption for the binary Outlook.exe so it can listen for all traffic types. 2) If running an older version of Microsoft Outlook (e.g. Outlook 2002 from Office XP) and you don't want to mess with firewall settings, then you can try the force polling registry edit. Outlook 2000 http://support.microsoft.com/default...304849&sd=RMVP Outlook 2002 http://support.microsoft.com/default...305572&sd=RMVP Outlook 2003 and later doesn't require the registry edit as it has logic to handle this. "Kerry" wrote in message ... Hello, We just switched from exchange 55 to exchange 2003. All staff have the outlook client. Oneof the things that was happening before our switch was that messages sent internal were not being delivered intantly to the staff persons inbox. In fact, if you opened and existing email, then you would see the inbox updated with messages that hadn't been delivered yet. Can anyone help with this, are there any settings that can bechanged to speed up delivery. Thanks in advance Kerry |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Never did a network scan to determine what the load would be, but you might
find http://msexchangeteam.com/archive/20...13/181940.aspx fun to read since it deals with this very question. "Kerry" wrote in message ... Hi I added the force polling registry key ... will this cause alot of network traffic if I apply it to 300 machines? "neo [mvp outlook]" wrote: Generally this means that client workstation is not receiving a UDP network packet from the server to update itself. Since you didn't mention what version of Microsoft Outlook your site is using nor operating system, I would start with the basics of... 1) If running Windows XP with the firewall (any firewall really), to turn it off or create an exemption for the binary Outlook.exe so it can listen for all traffic types. 2) If running an older version of Microsoft Outlook (e.g. Outlook 2002 from Office XP) and you don't want to mess with firewall settings, then you can try the force polling registry edit. Outlook 2000 http://support.microsoft.com/default...304849&sd=RMVP Outlook 2002 http://support.microsoft.com/default...305572&sd=RMVP Outlook 2003 and later doesn't require the registry edit as it has logic to handle this. "Kerry" wrote in message ... Hello, We just switched from exchange 55 to exchange 2003. All staff have the outlook client. Oneof the things that was happening before our switch was that messages sent internal were not being delivered intantly to the staff persons inbox. In fact, if you opened and existing email, then you would see the inbox updated with messages that hadn't been delivered yet. Can anyone help with this, are there any settings that can bechanged to speed up delivery. Thanks in advance Kerry |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why does OE6 show an envilope in the right low corner, if it does not get a new mesage? | Dmitry | Outlook Express | 6 | August 1st 06 07:24 AM |
Print out mesage with attachment as an icon | reidarT | Outlook - General Queries | 1 | July 6th 06 05:33 PM |
MAPI - Correlate sent mail with delivery and non-delivery receipts | Sankar | Outlook - Using Forms | 0 | May 18th 06 02:29 PM |
10 Second delay in IE opening | LoneStar | Outlook Express | 2 | March 30th 06 12:11 AM |
mon mesage | aminamohamed | Outlook Express | 0 | March 6th 06 01:58 PM |