![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My normal outgoing messages work fine, but a group email got rejected. It
only had about 10 names, and they all agreed to receive email from me. They are all in my address book, I am familiar with outlook express, but it has been erased, and now I am obligated to Outlook 03. Thanks JM |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Best guess from error message being thrown back by the mail server is that
it doesn't like the fact that Outlook 2003 is submitting the messages w/out a message id. Whomever runs you mail server should know that you can't apply RFC2822 to mail clients as they can submit incomplete messages (e.g. missing the message id) and it is up the mail server to complete. "JoJoJordan" wrote in message ... My normal outgoing messages work fine, but a group email got rejected. It only had about 10 names, and they all agreed to receive email from me. They are all in my address book, I am familiar with outlook express, but it has been erased, and now I am obligated to Outlook 03. Thanks JM |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you for your time, but I am not clear on your answer. Are you saying I
should contact Earthlink to solve the problem? I do think they have a troubleshooting option that I might be able to follow. Thanks. JM "neo [mvp outlook]" wrote: Best guess from error message being thrown back by the mail server is that it doesn't like the fact that Outlook 2003 is submitting the messages w/out a message id. Whomever runs you mail server should know that you can't apply RFC2822 to mail clients as they can submit incomplete messages (e.g. missing the message id) and it is up the mail server to complete. "JoJoJordan" wrote in message ... My normal outgoing messages work fine, but a group email got rejected. It only had about 10 names, and they all agreed to receive email from me. They are all in my address book, I am familiar with outlook express, but it has been erased, and now I am obligated to Outlook 03. Thanks JM |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes and don't be surprised if they say they don't support Microsoft Outlook.
(The ISP needs to upgrade/change the config on their servers.) "JoJoJordan" wrote in message ... Thank you for your time, but I am not clear on your answer. Are you saying I should contact Earthlink to solve the problem? I do think they have a troubleshooting option that I might be able to follow. Thanks. JM "neo [mvp outlook]" wrote: Best guess from error message being thrown back by the mail server is that it doesn't like the fact that Outlook 2003 is submitting the messages w/out a message id. Whomever runs you mail server should know that you can't apply RFC2822 to mail clients as they can submit incomplete messages (e.g. missing the message id) and it is up the mail server to complete. "JoJoJordan" wrote in message ... My normal outgoing messages work fine, but a group email got rejected. It only had about 10 names, and they all agreed to receive email from me. They are all in my address book, I am familiar with outlook express, but it has been erased, and now I am obligated to Outlook 03. Thanks JM |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cannot send emails; Error message: 550 relaying mail not allowed | Marvel Ebanks | Outlook - Installation | 0 | November 21st 06 11:55 AM |
550 mail relay message from O/look | Marge | Outlook - General Queries | 13 | August 2nd 06 03:47 AM |
550 not local host error outlook 2007 | Peter N | Outlook - Installation | 3 | July 31st 06 05:27 PM |
how to make and store a standard message?? | musiclover | Outlook Express | 1 | May 6th 06 09:10 PM |
Run VBA Code from 'new mail message' on standard toolbar | Carmi | Outlook and VBA | 8 | March 31st 06 05:53 PM |