|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
March 21st 06, 04:19 PM
posted to microsoft.public.outlook.installation
|
|||
|
|||
Bandwidth question w/ deployment
We are looking at upgrade about 70,000 users worldwide from Outlook 2000
to 2003. We were looking at using the cached mode by default. The network people are concerned that as we upgrade groups of people the .OST generation process will saturate the bandwidth of the connections both in the datacenter leading to the Excahnge servers and in the area the outlook upgrade took place. Does anyone know of any good documention that covers this case? Thanks. Jeff 
|
| Ads |
|
#2
March 25th 06, 08:33 AM
posted to microsoft.public.outlook.installation
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bandwidth question w/ deployment
You might want to ask this in microsoft.public.exchange.admin.
-- Milly Staples [MVP - Outlook] Post all replies to the group to keep the discussion intact. All unsolicited mail sent to my personal account will be deleted without reading. After furious head scratching, Jeff Senter asked: | We are looking at upgrade about 70,000 users worldwide from Outlook | 2000 to 2003. We were looking at using the cached mode by default. | | The network people are concerned that as we upgrade groups of people | the .OST generation process will saturate the bandwidth of the | connections both in the datacenter leading to the Excahnge servers | and in the area the outlook upgrade took place. | | Does anyone know of any good documention that covers this case? | | Thanks. | | Jeff
|
|
#3
March 28th 06, 08:51 PM
posted to microsoft.public.outlook.installation
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bandwidth question w/ deployment
The article at http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/as...402591033.aspx discusses "Options for staging a Cached Exchange Mode deployment."
-- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "Jeff Senter" wrote in message ... We are looking at upgrade about 70,000 users worldwide from Outlook 2000 to 2003. We were looking at using the cached mode by default. The network people are concerned that as we upgrade groups of people the .OST generation process will saturate the bandwidth of the connections both in the datacenter leading to the Excahnge servers and in the area the outlook upgrade took place. Does anyone know of any good documention that covers this case? Thanks. Jeff
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Outlook Deployment using GPO / MST | Keith Schlottman | Outlook - Installation | 8 | April 25th 06 08:43 AM |
| Outlook Deployment and Configuration | Pablo E. Perie K | Outlook - Installation | 1 | January 31st 06 06:02 PM |
| Question | Jeremiah | Outlook - General Queries | 3 | January 31st 06 02:33 AM |
| Office2003/Outlook2003 deployment | Keith Schlottman | Outlook - Installation | 6 | January 30th 06 09:52 PM |
| Outlook deployment | Sue Mosher [MVP-Outlook] | Outlook - Installation | 0 | January 18th 06 08:00 PM |
Linear Mode
