![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Outlook 2003 and Exchange Server 2003; I have used the instructions per the
article http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;319142 as well as read other postings; I have closed Outlook and reopened and the settings work for new contacts. The fields are parsed correctly when I open a contact, but I can't get the order to change for existing contacts. Ideas? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You neglected to state to what view you are referring and on what field that
view is sorted. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "laralea" wrote in message ... Outlook 2003 and Exchange Server 2003; I have used the instructions per the article http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;319142 as well as read other postings; I have closed Outlook and reopened and the settings work for new contacts. The fields are parsed correctly when I open a contact, but I can't get the order to change for existing contacts. Ideas? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sort is on full name field and the behavior is the same in address card view
or phone list view. The settings work correctly for new entered contacts, but do not change existing contacts. Of course they can be changed one at a time, but the users with 100's of contacts aren't real thrilled about that idea. "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: You neglected to state to what view you are referring and on what field that view is sorted. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "laralea" wrote in message ... Outlook 2003 and Exchange Server 2003; I have used the instructions per the article http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;319142 as well as read other postings; I have closed Outlook and reopened and the settings work for new contacts. The fields are parsed correctly when I open a contact, but I can't get the order to change for existing contacts. Ideas? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sort settings are never maintained for imported Contacts. Are you sure the
view sorts on the Full Name field? The Address Card view sorts on the File As... field. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "laralea" wrote in message ... Sort is on full name field and the behavior is the same in address card view or phone list view. The settings work correctly for new entered contacts, but do not change existing contacts. Of course they can be changed one at a time, but the users with 100's of contacts aren't real thrilled about that idea. "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: You neglected to state to what view you are referring and on what field that view is sorted. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "laralea" wrote in message ... Outlook 2003 and Exchange Server 2003; I have used the instructions per the article http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;319142 as well as read other postings; I have closed Outlook and reopened and the settings work for new contacts. The fields are parsed correctly when I open a contact, but I can't get the order to change for existing contacts. Ideas? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sort order changes in Outlook | Davis | Outlook - General Queries | 0 | June 2nd 06 02:36 PM |
Outlook should not sort the liste of children in alpha order | jfn | Outlook - Using Contacts | 4 | May 1st 06 12:25 PM |
Lotus notes to outlook | max_mont | Outlook - General Queries | 1 | April 9th 06 03:50 PM |
Sort order changes when I don't want it to | Teentour | Outlook - Using Contacts | 2 | April 6th 06 09:54 PM |
How do I import Lotus Notes contact into outlook | Michael | Outlook - Using Contacts | 1 | March 1st 06 11:27 AM |