![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's the scoop.
This was a new new computer initially installed on a peer to peer. The old computer was running a "copy" of Office 2000. It could not be updated. (read between the lines) I could not do a files/transfer wizard because it was x64 from 32 bit. At that time, the old wizard did not work (new one wasn't available), therefore we had to copy the files over. Two weeks ago, we joined the computers to a SBS domain. The messages came over, but Oulook was set up with personal folders and exchange folders. The contacts were not present at all. Therefore I copied the .wab file over (old computer) and tried to imported those in. The message I would receive was "0" contacts imported and no other error messages. (The contacts have never been successfully on the new computer in OUtlook either peer or exchange.) What they had been doing, for a workaround, was that they would open their wab file from their desktop and then right click and send email. This would then put the address into the "exchange" contact list for further use until this could be resolved. This has been working. However, now one person needs to do a mail merge. So, I "moved" their old contacts from their pst file into the "exchange" mail. (I removed their pst data file from their Outlook). So, when you look at their contacts it all looks like one contact list. Before there was "contacts in personal folders", etc. This works great while in Outlook 2003. However when they try to do the mail merge, they can't see their "old" contacts in the list, only the "newer" ones in "exchange". One of the ?'s I have is if these are "distribution list" or folders. Ssince we are talking about Outlook 2000 (NO updates), is the technology so different, that it would cause problems. Answers to your questions: 1. They had "contacts in personal folders" (verbatum), People at seminar in personal folders, hotel contacts in personal folders etc.. Within these "folders" were contacts. These would not be listed in their address book under Outlook 2003.(I never used 2000, so are these distribution lists, or contacts within a folder?) 2. See history above. 3. I have never tried "merge" before as I have never had this issue. "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: Importing is never the correct way to transfer Outlook data. Provide more details. There is no real information here. Include: 1. How your Outlook 2000 Contacts differ from the others 2. Why you had to import Contacts at all if you are using Exchange 2. Why you can't merge to these Contacts: What precisely are you doing and what happens when you try? -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "T Weitz" wrote in message news ![]() I imported/moved Outlook 2000 contacts into Outlook 2003. (Exchange). Now I can't do a mail merge with the 2000 contacts, but I can with the current contacts. How can I do a mail merge with the 2000 contacts and make them "true" 2003 contacts? Any suggestions? Therese Small Business Specialist Certified Partner ETM Computer Services |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Imported contacts email doesn't work | prince225 | Outlook - Using Contacts | 0 | August 23rd 06 08:33 PM |
How To Display Imported Contacts In The GAL? | Doug G | Outlook - Using Contacts | 1 | June 30th 06 03:13 PM |
Option to show why contacts may not have been imported (from OE) | MrGadget | Outlook - Using Contacts | 0 | May 1st 06 06:44 PM |
Contacts information imported but not usable | mike g | Outlook - Using Contacts | 7 | March 13th 06 10:58 PM |
Imported contacts sort by title | Circe | Outlook - Using Contacts | 1 | March 3rd 06 09:13 PM |