A Microsoft Outlook email forum. Outlook Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Outlook Banter forum » Microsoft Outlook Email Newsgroups » Outlook - Using Contacts
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Outlook Contacts list is abbreviated --- Why?



 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 10th 07, 01:49 AM posted to microsoft.public.outlook.contacts
Bruce in BR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Outlook Contacts list is abbreviated --- Why?

I have an outlook address book with 199 entries. If I am within the
"contacts" tab, I can use them all effectively.

However, if I am within the message/mail tab and I want to send a message,
clicking on the "To" button brings up a list with only 29 of the names from
the database. I have no idea how to get all of the names from the entire
list to appear as choices.

Do you have any suggestions?


Ads
  #2  
Old March 10th 07, 02:07 AM posted to microsoft.public.outlook.contacts
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,348
Default Outlook Contacts list is abbreviated --- Why?

Just that you post more information more accurately. Outlook does not even
have an address book. It only has Contact Folders. The address book is
simply a view of the electronic addresses in your Contacts Folder.
Accordingly, there is no way it can contain more addresses than your Contact
Folder contains.
State your Outlook version. Reconcile the discrepancies in your post.

--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Bruce in BR" Bruce in wrote in message
...
I have an outlook address book with 199 entries. If I am within the
"contacts" tab, I can use them all effectively.

However, if I am within the message/mail tab and I want to send a message,
clicking on the "To" button brings up a list with only 29 of the names
from
the database. I have no idea how to get all of the names from the entire
list to appear as choices.

Do you have any suggestions?




  #3  
Old March 10th 07, 03:36 AM posted to microsoft.public.outlook.contacts
Bruce in BR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Outlook Contacts list is abbreviated --- Why?

Ok.. Forgive me for using improper information. I'll try to be more clear.

I have 1 contact folder. It is called "Contacts". That is where ALL of my
contacts are stored. There are 199 contacts.

Outlook 2003 (11.8118.8122) SP2 is the version I'm using.

If I open the "Contacts" pane, I can see all of my contacts and edit/use
them as intended. But if I am in the "Mail" pane and I click New/To what
shows up in the "Contacts" list is only 29 contacts. Why? I want to be able
to scroll or search through the entire database of contacts to choose my mail
recipient(s). Can you please help?

If this is not sufficient information for you to answer the question, please
tell me whatever else it is that you might need. I still want to solve my
problem.

Many Thanks for your timely response.

Bruce



"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote:

Just that you post more information more accurately. Outlook does not even
have an address book. It only has Contact Folders. The address book is
simply a view of the electronic addresses in your Contacts Folder.
Accordingly, there is no way it can contain more addresses than your Contact
Folder contains.
State your Outlook version. Reconcile the discrepancies in your post.

--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Bruce in BR" Bruce in wrote in message
...
I have an outlook address book with 199 entries. If I am within the
"contacts" tab, I can use them all effectively.

However, if I am within the message/mail tab and I want to send a message,
clicking on the "To" button brings up a list with only 29 of the names
from
the database. I have no idea how to get all of the names from the entire
list to appear as choices.

Do you have any suggestions?





  #4  
Old March 10th 07, 10:55 AM posted to microsoft.public.outlook.contacts
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,348
Default Outlook Contacts list is abbreviated --- Why?

Because the Address Book only shows the valid electronic addresses in your
Contacts Folder. Currently, that would be 29.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Bruce in BR" wrote in message
...
Ok.. Forgive me for using improper information. I'll try to be more
clear.

I have 1 contact folder. It is called "Contacts". That is where ALL of
my
contacts are stored. There are 199 contacts.

Outlook 2003 (11.8118.8122) SP2 is the version I'm using.

If I open the "Contacts" pane, I can see all of my contacts and edit/use
them as intended. But if I am in the "Mail" pane and I click New/To what
shows up in the "Contacts" list is only 29 contacts. Why? I want to be
able
to scroll or search through the entire database of contacts to choose my
mail
recipient(s). Can you please help?

If this is not sufficient information for you to answer the question,
please
tell me whatever else it is that you might need. I still want to solve my
problem.

Many Thanks for your timely response.

Bruce



"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote:

Just that you post more information more accurately. Outlook does not
even
have an address book. It only has Contact Folders. The address book is
simply a view of the electronic addresses in your Contacts Folder.
Accordingly, there is no way it can contain more addresses than your
Contact
Folder contains.
State your Outlook version. Reconcile the discrepancies in your post.

--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Bruce in BR" Bruce in wrote in message
...
I have an outlook address book with 199 entries. If I am within the
"contacts" tab, I can use them all effectively.

However, if I am within the message/mail tab and I want to send a
message,
clicking on the "To" button brings up a list with only 29 of the names
from
the database. I have no idea how to get all of the names from the
entire
list to appear as choices.

Do you have any suggestions?







  #5  
Old March 10th 07, 03:02 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook.contacts
Bruce in BR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Outlook Contacts list is abbreviated --- Why?

OK,

What do you mean by "valid electronic addresses"? Does that mean that 170
of the contacts I entered are invalid? If so, how do I make them all "valid"?

Bruce

"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote:

Because the Address Book only shows the valid electronic addresses in your
Contacts Folder. Currently, that would be 29.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Bruce in BR" wrote in message
...
Ok.. Forgive me for using improper information. I'll try to be more
clear.

I have 1 contact folder. It is called "Contacts". That is where ALL of
my
contacts are stored. There are 199 contacts.

Outlook 2003 (11.8118.8122) SP2 is the version I'm using.

If I open the "Contacts" pane, I can see all of my contacts and edit/use
them as intended. But if I am in the "Mail" pane and I click New/To what
shows up in the "Contacts" list is only 29 contacts. Why? I want to be
able
to scroll or search through the entire database of contacts to choose my
mail
recipient(s). Can you please help?

If this is not sufficient information for you to answer the question,
please
tell me whatever else it is that you might need. I still want to solve my
problem.

Many Thanks for your timely response.

Bruce



"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote:

Just that you post more information more accurately. Outlook does not
even
have an address book. It only has Contact Folders. The address book is
simply a view of the electronic addresses in your Contacts Folder.
Accordingly, there is no way it can contain more addresses than your
Contact
Folder contains.
State your Outlook version. Reconcile the discrepancies in your post.

--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Bruce in BR" Bruce in wrote in message
...
I have an outlook address book with 199 entries. If I am within the
"contacts" tab, I can use them all effectively.

However, if I am within the message/mail tab and I want to send a
message,
clicking on the "To" button brings up a list with only 29 of the names
from
the database. I have no idea how to get all of the names from the
entire
list to appear as choices.

Do you have any suggestions?








  #6  
Old March 10th 07, 04:14 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook.contacts
Terry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 91
Default Outlook Contacts list is abbreviated --- Why?

Here's the logic of Outlook's Mail "To": I'll show you contacts that you can
send e-mail to. And to do that, I'll look at each contact's "e-mail" field.
If the contact doesn't have an e-mail address or seems invalid (e.g.
abc@hotmail is invalid because it's missing ".com" at the end), then I won't
should you the contact. Why send out an e-mail to an address where it can't
reach its destination, right?



"Bruce in BR" wrote:

OK,

What do you mean by "valid electronic addresses"? Does that mean that 170
of the contacts I entered are invalid? If so, how do I make them all "valid"?

Bruce

"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote:

Because the Address Book only shows the valid electronic addresses in your
Contacts Folder. Currently, that would be 29.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Bruce in BR" wrote in message
...
Ok.. Forgive me for using improper information. I'll try to be more
clear.

I have 1 contact folder. It is called "Contacts". That is where ALL of
my
contacts are stored. There are 199 contacts.

Outlook 2003 (11.8118.8122) SP2 is the version I'm using.

If I open the "Contacts" pane, I can see all of my contacts and edit/use
them as intended. But if I am in the "Mail" pane and I click New/To what
shows up in the "Contacts" list is only 29 contacts. Why? I want to be
able
to scroll or search through the entire database of contacts to choose my
mail
recipient(s). Can you please help?

If this is not sufficient information for you to answer the question,
please
tell me whatever else it is that you might need. I still want to solve my
problem.

Many Thanks for your timely response.

Bruce



"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote:

Just that you post more information more accurately. Outlook does not
even
have an address book. It only has Contact Folders. The address book is
simply a view of the electronic addresses in your Contacts Folder.
Accordingly, there is no way it can contain more addresses than your
Contact
Folder contains.
State your Outlook version. Reconcile the discrepancies in your post.

--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Bruce in BR" Bruce in wrote in message
...
I have an outlook address book with 199 entries. If I am within the
"contacts" tab, I can use them all effectively.

However, if I am within the message/mail tab and I want to send a
message,
clicking on the "To" button brings up a list with only 29 of the names
from
the database. I have no idea how to get all of the names from the
entire
list to appear as choices.

Do you have any suggestions?








  #7  
Old March 10th 07, 11:07 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook.contacts
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,348
Default Outlook Contacts list is abbreviated --- Why?

Precisely. Only electronic addresses appear in the Outlook Address Book. So
the number of entries in the Outlook Address Book is never the same as the
Contacts Folder. For example, if you have 100 Contacts and each Contact has
3 electronic addresses, you will have 300 entries in the Outlook Address
Book. On the other hand if you have 100 Contacts but only 29 of them have a
single electronic address, you will have 29 entries.
It is easy to tell if an electronic address is valid: it will be underlined
in the Contact Record.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Terry" wrote in message
...
Here's the logic of Outlook's Mail "To": I'll show you contacts that you
can
send e-mail to. And to do that, I'll look at each contact's "e-mail"
field.
If the contact doesn't have an e-mail address or seems invalid (e.g.
abc@hotmail is invalid because it's missing ".com" at the end), then I
won't
should you the contact. Why send out an e-mail to an address where it
can't
reach its destination, right?



"Bruce in BR" wrote:

OK,

What do you mean by "valid electronic addresses"? Does that mean that
170
of the contacts I entered are invalid? If so, how do I make them all
"valid"?

Bruce

"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote:

Because the Address Book only shows the valid electronic addresses in
your
Contacts Folder. Currently, that would be 29.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Bruce in BR" wrote in message
...
Ok.. Forgive me for using improper information. I'll try to be more
clear.

I have 1 contact folder. It is called "Contacts". That is where ALL
of
my
contacts are stored. There are 199 contacts.

Outlook 2003 (11.8118.8122) SP2 is the version I'm using.

If I open the "Contacts" pane, I can see all of my contacts and
edit/use
them as intended. But if I am in the "Mail" pane and I click New/To
what
shows up in the "Contacts" list is only 29 contacts. Why? I want to
be
able
to scroll or search through the entire database of contacts to choose
my
mail
recipient(s). Can you please help?

If this is not sufficient information for you to answer the question,
please
tell me whatever else it is that you might need. I still want to
solve my
problem.

Many Thanks for your timely response.

Bruce



"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote:

Just that you post more information more accurately. Outlook does
not
even
have an address book. It only has Contact Folders. The address book
is
simply a view of the electronic addresses in your Contacts Folder.
Accordingly, there is no way it can contain more addresses than your
Contact
Folder contains.
State your Outlook version. Reconcile the discrepancies in your
post.

--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Bruce in BR" Bruce in wrote in
message
...
I have an outlook address book with 199 entries. If I am within
the
"contacts" tab, I can use them all effectively.

However, if I am within the message/mail tab and I want to send a
message,
clicking on the "To" button brings up a list with only 29 of the
names
from
the database. I have no idea how to get all of the names from the
entire
list to appear as choices.

Do you have any suggestions?










  #8  
Old April 4th 07, 11:16 AM posted to microsoft.public.outlook.contacts
Mike Preece
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Outlook Contacts list is abbreviated --- Why?

On Mar 11, 12:07 am, "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]"
wrote:
Precisely. Only electronic addresses appear in theOutlookAddress Book. So
the number of entries in theOutlookAddress Book is never the same as the
Contacts Folder. For example, if you have 100 Contacts and eachContacthas
3 electronic addresses, you will have 300 entries in theOutlookAddress
Book. On the other hand if you have 100 Contacts but only 29 of them have a
single electronic address, you will have 29 entries.
It is easy to tell if an electronic address is valid: it will be underlined
in theContactRecord.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]"Terry" wrote in message

...



Here's the logic ofOutlook'sMail "To": I'll show you contacts that you
can
send e-mail to. And to do that, I'll look at eachcontact's"e-mail"
field.
If thecontactdoesn't have an e-mail address or seems invalid (e.g.
abc@hotmail is invalid because it's missing ".com" at the end), then I
won't
should you thecontact. Why send out an e-mail to an address where it
can't
reach its destination, right?


"Bruce in BR" wrote:


OK,


What do you mean by "valid electronic addresses"? Does that mean that
170
of the contacts I entered are invalid? If so, how do I make them all
"valid"?


Bruce


"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote:


Because the Address Book only shows the valid electronic addresses in
your
Contacts Folder. Currently, that would be 29.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Bruce in BR" wrote in message
...
Ok.. Forgive me for using improper information. I'll try to be more
clear.


I have 1contactfolder. It is called "Contacts". That is where ALL
of
my
contacts are stored. There are 199 contacts.


Outlook2003 (11.8118.8122) SP2 is the version I'm using.


If I open the "Contacts" pane, I can see all of my contacts and
edit/use
them as intended. But if I am in the "Mail" pane and I click New/To
what
shows up in the "Contacts"listis only 29 contacts. Why? I want to
be
able
to scroll or search through the entire database of contacts to choose
my
mail
recipient(s). Can you please help?


If this is not sufficient information for you to answer the question,
please
tell me whatever else it is that you might need. I still want to
solve my
problem.


Many Thanks for your timely response.


Bruce


"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote:


Just that you post more information more accurately.Outlookdoes
not
even
have an address book. It only hasContactFolders. The address book
is
simply a view of the electronic addresses in your Contacts Folder.
Accordingly, there is no way it can contain more addresses than your
Contact
Folder contains.
State yourOutlookversion. Reconcile the discrepancies in your
post.


--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Bruce in BR" Bruce in wrote in
message
...
I have anoutlookaddress book with 199 entries. If I am within
the
"contacts" tab, I can use them all effectively.


However, if I am within the message/mail tab and I want to send a
message,
clicking on the "To" button brings up alistwith only 29 of the
names
from
the database. I have no idea how to get all of the names from the
entire
listto appear as choices.


Do you have any suggestions?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Well why didn't you say that?

  #9  
Old April 4th 07, 12:02 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook.contacts
Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,348
Default Outlook Contacts list is abbreviated --- Why?

Did you have a question?
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Mike Preece" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Mar 11, 12:07 am, "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]"
wrote:
Precisely. Only electronic addresses appear in theOutlookAddress Book. So
the number of entries in theOutlookAddress Book is never the same as the
Contacts Folder. For example, if you have 100 Contacts and eachContacthas
3 electronic addresses, you will have 300 entries in theOutlookAddress
Book. On the other hand if you have 100 Contacts but only 29 of them have
a
single electronic address, you will have 29 entries.
It is easy to tell if an electronic address is valid: it will be
underlined
in theContactRecord.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]"Terry" wrote in message

...



Here's the logic ofOutlook'sMail "To": I'll show you contacts that you
can
send e-mail to. And to do that, I'll look at eachcontact's"e-mail"
field.
If thecontactdoesn't have an e-mail address or seems invalid (e.g.
abc@hotmail is invalid because it's missing ".com" at the end), then I
won't
should you thecontact. Why send out an e-mail to an address where it
can't
reach its destination, right?


"Bruce in BR" wrote:


OK,


What do you mean by "valid electronic addresses"? Does that mean that
170
of the contacts I entered are invalid? If so, how do I make them all
"valid"?


Bruce


"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote:


Because the Address Book only shows the valid electronic addresses
in
your
Contacts Folder. Currently, that would be 29.
--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Bruce in BR" wrote in message
...
Ok.. Forgive me for using improper information. I'll try to be
more
clear.


I have 1contactfolder. It is called "Contacts". That is where
ALL
of
my
contacts are stored. There are 199 contacts.


Outlook2003 (11.8118.8122) SP2 is the version I'm using.


If I open the "Contacts" pane, I can see all of my contacts and
edit/use
them as intended. But if I am in the "Mail" pane and I click
New/To
what
shows up in the "Contacts"listis only 29 contacts. Why? I want
to
be
able
to scroll or search through the entire database of contacts to
choose
my
mail
recipient(s). Can you please help?


If this is not sufficient information for you to answer the
question,
please
tell me whatever else it is that you might need. I still want to
solve my
problem.


Many Thanks for your timely response.


Bruce


"Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote:


Just that you post more information more accurately.Outlookdoes
not
even
have an address book. It only hasContactFolders. The address book
is
simply a view of the electronic addresses in your Contacts
Folder.
Accordingly, there is no way it can contain more addresses than
your
Contact
Folder contains.
State yourOutlookversion. Reconcile the discrepancies in your
post.


--
Russ Valentine
[MVP-Outlook]
"Bruce in BR" Bruce in wrote in
message
...
I have anoutlookaddress book with 199 entries. If I am within
the
"contacts" tab, I can use them all effectively.


However, if I am within the message/mail tab and I want to send
a
message,
clicking on the "To" button brings up alistwith only 29 of the
names
from
the database. I have no idea how to get all of the names from
the
entire
listto appear as choices.


Do you have any suggestions?- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -


Well why didn't you say that?



 




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How do I export an Excel list to a contacts distribution list HayesV Outlook - Using Contacts 3 December 15th 08 06:00 PM
changing contacts frm global address list to contacts in outlook 2003 Steven S Outlook - General Queries 1 December 7th 06 02:51 AM
How to print Global Address List, or export to Contacts List? Duane Outlook - Using Contacts 1 August 11th 06 01:51 AM
Distribtion list affected my contacts list Tamera Outlook - Using Contacts 1 August 11th 06 01:47 AM
I want distribution list to look like contacts list when open Stan Outlook - Using Contacts 1 July 3rd 06 10:14 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Outlook Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.