![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been using Outlook for years for business contacts, but now that I've
retired, personal contacts seem much more complex. Similar improvements have been requested before, but since I just got Outlook 2007 and saw few improvements in the area of personal contacts, I wanted to reiterate my (and probably millions of retirees needs). Personal contacts are just too complex for a single contact record for a family. A husband and wife each may have home and business addresses, multiple phone numbers and multiple email addresses. Each of six kids may or may not have their own home and business address, phone, email, IM address, birthdates and the whole shebang that their parents have. My suggestions for improvement a 1. Have a new tab for a personal contacts form with many more personal fields, e.g. date of birth, date of graduation, date of death, etc., and yes, you do keep track of people who have died. Now you have to track their lawyer, accountant, insurance, etc. This new form may simply be an expanded version of the existing contacts or details record. 2. In the personal contacts form, have a tab for "related records". 3. The "related records" form may consist of only two lists, both allowing a relatively unlimited number of entries. 4.The first list, the "people" list, would consist of "name" and "relationship". Some examples of entries would be: John Smith, son Pocahantas, John's girlfriend 5. Double clicking on "John Smith's" record would immediately open his contact record. If it didn't exist, Outlook would ask if you wanted to create one. If you did, it would ask if you wanted to copy contact information from the "parent" record. In the case of John Smith, your son, if he was living with you, you would copy the information and then edit it, changing phone, email, birthdate, etc. If everything is new, you would enter the information you have in a new contact form. 6. Creating the new form (John Smith's) would immediately create a "related record" entry with the name from the "parent" record. You would have to fill in only the relationship. To be most useful, both directions of the relationship would have to be tracked. In addition to "Pocahantas" being shown in the "parent's" "people" list, it will probably be shown in "John Smith's" people list so that you could get to the record from multiple directions when searching for Pocahantas. 7. The second list would be "groups" and would list all groups the current contact belongs to. Some examples would be, "Church", "Neighbors" and "Running Club". If you add a group name to the list, then if the group record didn't exist, Outlook should ask if you want to create the group (you may have misspelled it). If a new group is created or if a new group record is added to a list, the name from the "parent" record should automatically be added to the group so you could easily search for all members of a group. Again, the two way connection must be maintained. 8. Make it possible to easily send emails to all members of a group (or to not send to a few selected members). I hope these suggestions are useful and understandable. -- Lyle Montrose, Colorado ---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane. http://www.microsoft.com/office/comm...tlook.contacts |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Montrose Lyle wrote:
I've been using Outlook for years for business contacts, but now that I've retired, personal contacts seem much more complex. Similar improvements have been requested before, but since I just got Outlook 2007 and saw few improvements in the area of personal contacts, I wanted to reiterate my (and probably millions of retirees needs). I think your suggestions are good, but Outlook is not really a Contact Manager, per se. Nonetheless, there's no reason why you couldn't design your own Contacts form to include this information. -- Brian Tillman |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian,
Thanks for your reply. You are right in that it is easy to add lots of additional fields to a form. The hard part is doing the connections to related records and groups. As far as Outlook not being a Contact Manager, there seems to be a whole section of the program called "Business Contact Manager". Why not a "Personal Contact Manager"? I could probably spend lots of time and design such a thing in Access, but the problem is tying it back into my email program. I'm not the one with the expertise to do it. Microsoft has that expertise. -- Lyle Montrose, Colorado "Brian Tillman" wrote: Montrose Lyle wrote: I've been using Outlook for years for business contacts, but now that I've retired, personal contacts seem much more complex. Similar improvements have been requested before, but since I just got Outlook 2007 and saw few improvements in the area of personal contacts, I wanted to reiterate my (and probably millions of retirees needs). I think your suggestions are good, but Outlook is not really a Contact Manager, per se. Nonetheless, there's no reason why you couldn't design your own Contacts form to include this information. -- Brian Tillman |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can design a custom form page, and save it as a Form Region. This is
something new with Outlook 2007, and it makes designing a custom form much easier, as a Form Region automatically carries with it the style of the form. As far as I know, it's not possible to create the sort of cross-referencing you describe with Outlook, but at least you'll have a page where you can record more information on a contact. -- Michael "Montrose Lyle" wrote in message ... Brian, Thanks for your reply. You are right in that it is easy to add lots of additional fields to a form. The hard part is doing the connections to related records and groups. As far as Outlook not being a Contact Manager, there seems to be a whole section of the program called "Business Contact Manager". Why not a "Personal Contact Manager"? I could probably spend lots of time and design such a thing in Access, but the problem is tying it back into my email program. I'm not the one with the expertise to do it. Microsoft has that expertise. -- Lyle Montrose, Colorado "Brian Tillman" wrote: Montrose Lyle wrote: I've been using Outlook for years for business contacts, but now that I've retired, personal contacts seem much more complex. Similar improvements have been requested before, but since I just got Outlook 2007 and saw few improvements in the area of personal contacts, I wanted to reiterate my (and probably millions of retirees needs). I think your suggestions are good, but Outlook is not really a Contact Manager, per se. Nonetheless, there's no reason why you couldn't design your own Contacts form to include this information. -- Brian Tillman |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Email notification improvement for Outlook Express or Outlook? | History Fan | Outlook Express | 5 | May 6th 07 01:24 PM |
How can I copy a Contact From our public Contacts to My personal | tim t8l8c | Outlook - Using Contacts | 1 | March 31st 07 12:03 AM |
I want to set up seperate Contact Indexes for personal and busines | [email protected] | Outlook - Using Contacts | 1 | January 15th 07 06:59 PM |
Copy to personal calendar/contact | AW | Outlook - Using Contacts | 0 | November 20th 06 08:44 PM |
Outlook improvement / User friendly comments | Artur | Outlook - Calandaring | 0 | March 15th 06 01:51 PM |