![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Judy:
You may have misunderstood my message as I did not indicate that Russ's response was not relevant. However, I did indicate that the solution provided did not work for me. Using the Phone List table in Contacts, I can select any field to group by e.g., Company or Job Title, and then sort on any field in the list and not lose the group by settings except for when I group by Category. This problem is not unique to my Outlook settings as others in my firm are experiencing the same problem. The only solution that I have been able to come up with is to group by a field that has no content i.e, Callback, and then sub group by Category. -- Christina "Judy Gleeson (MVP Outlook)" wrote: It works with any table View in 2003. In Contacts it works with the Phone List View. It would be nice if you had tried it before telling all readers that it's not relevant. Thousands of people read each of these posts! Judy Gleeson MVP Outlook Trainer and Consultant read my articles he www.judygleeson.com Canberra, Australia how to post questions: http://support.microsoft.com/?id=555375 "Christina" wrote in message ... Thanks, Russ. However, I think the solution you provided may be for use with Tasks as it has the Simple and Detailed view options. However, I did attempt to do something similar in the Contacts view using one of the standard views - Phone List. I continue to have the same problem when I sort on another field. For whatever reason, it just doesn't want to keep the group by when sorting on another field. -- Christina "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: Well no wonder. Judy Gleeson has provided the following workaround to overcome the new way Outlook 2003 sorts the "By Category" view: Use the Detailed or Simple List view, show the columns you want to see (field chooser), click the column (eg Last Name) you want to sort by, THEN use the group by box to group by Category. That should have alphabetical as well as the grouping. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "Christina" wrote in message ... Outlook 2003. -- Christina "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: I'll bet you know your Outlook version. We don't. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "Christina" wrote in message ... I like to view my contacts by category. My default sort in this view is by Full Name. When I sort by another field, I lose my category groupings i.e., it looks like a phone list view even though I am still in category view. The only way to get my contacts grouped by category again is to reset the category view via View Arrange By Define Views Reset. I have tried making my own custom view grouping by category, but the problem happens here, too. Is there anyway to "lock" the grouping by category in the Category view so that sorting by different fields does not affect the view? -- Christina |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Display Presence" Setting Won't Stick | Ridge Kennedy | Outlook - General Queries | 0 | October 25th 06 06:38 PM |
"View by Category" messed up | Lisa M | Outlook - General Queries | 5 | July 24th 06 02:55 PM |
Can we set a particular category as a "default" category for all messages (w/o using a template, etc.)? | StargateFanFromWork | Outlook - General Queries | 2 | July 7th 06 09:07 AM |
Adding information to columns in "Category" view | emlawpro | Outlook - Using Contacts | 3 | March 18th 06 03:12 AM |
adding columns in "category" view | emlawpro | Outlook - Using Contacts | 2 | March 16th 06 06:19 PM |