![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I use Windows Search 4.0 with Outlook 2007 to look up contact phone numbers.
This has been a great tool to allow me to look up a caller ID numbers and find the associated contact in my address book. But I have found that phone numbers in the "Business phone 2" field seem to be invisible to Windows search. The problem occurs with all contacts in my address book. The number is there in the "Business Phone 2" field, but Windows Search cannot find it.I have painfully rebuild the index, yet WS still cannot find any numbers listed in the "Business Phone 2" field. Here's what I use this search for... 1. My phone rings 2. I quickly look at the displayed phone number on my caller ID. 3. If there is no name, I enter the last four digits into the search window in Outlook contacts. 4. Before the fourth ring, the search results show me all contacts with those four digits in one of the phone numbers, and I know who's calling. But this doesn't work if the phone number is in the "Business phone 2" field. WHY NOT? Is there a way to make this work? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When you examine the fields that IS indexes, you will note that "Business
Phone 2" is not among them. You use Advanced Find for fields that IS does not index. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "GWizz" wrote in message news ![]() I use Windows Search 4.0 with Outlook 2007 to look up contact phone numbers. This has been a great tool to allow me to look up a caller ID numbers and find the associated contact in my address book. But I have found that phone numbers in the "Business phone 2" field seem to be invisible to Windows search. The problem occurs with all contacts in my address book. The number is there in the "Business Phone 2" field, but Windows Search cannot find it.I have painfully rebuild the index, yet WS still cannot find any numbers listed in the "Business Phone 2" field. Here's what I use this search for... 1. My phone rings 2. I quickly look at the displayed phone number on my caller ID. 3. If there is no name, I enter the last four digits into the search window in Outlook contacts. 4. Before the fourth ring, the search results show me all contacts with those four digits in one of the phone numbers, and I know who's calling. But this doesn't work if the phone number is in the "Business phone 2" field. WHY NOT? Is there a way to make this work? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I understand your comment about indexing, but I do not understand what "IS'
is. I need a way to QUICKLY look up phone numbers. Advanced find isn't fast enough, and the way it display the results is not "friendly" enough to pick out the callers name (remember, I'm doing this while the phone is ringing) This leaves me with two questions and a suggestion for Microsoft: 1. How can I identify the fields that ARE indexed? 2. Is there a way to add fields to those indexed? Suggestion: I can dial a phone number from inside a contact record, please add the ability for Outlook to pick up the caller ID and tell me who is calling. Thanks "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: When you examine the fields that IS indexes, you will note that "Business Phone 2" is not among them. You use Advanced Find for fields that IS does not index. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "GWizz" wrote in message news ![]() I use Windows Search 4.0 with Outlook 2007 to look up contact phone numbers. This has been a great tool to allow me to look up a caller ID numbers and find the associated contact in my address book. But I have found that phone numbers in the "Business phone 2" field seem to be invisible to Windows search. The problem occurs with all contacts in my address book. The number is there in the "Business Phone 2" field, but Windows Search cannot find it.I have painfully rebuild the index, yet WS still cannot find any numbers listed in the "Business Phone 2" field. Here's what I use this search for... 1. My phone rings 2. I quickly look at the displayed phone number on my caller ID. 3. If there is no name, I enter the last four digits into the search window in Outlook contacts. 4. Before the fourth ring, the search results show me all contacts with those four digits in one of the phone numbers, and I know who's calling. But this doesn't work if the phone number is in the "Business phone 2" field. WHY NOT? Is there a way to make this work? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
IS = Instant Search. That's what you said you were using. Just expand the IS
dialog box (hint: down arrows) to see which fields you should be able to pick up with IS and which fields you can add to IS. Outlook has no dialing functions whatsoever. It simply hands off to the Windows dialer, a very bare bones utility. You seem to be looking for CRM software. Outlook is not and never will be CRM software. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "GWizz" wrote in message ... I understand your comment about indexing, but I do not understand what "IS' is. I need a way to QUICKLY look up phone numbers. Advanced find isn't fast enough, and the way it display the results is not "friendly" enough to pick out the callers name (remember, I'm doing this while the phone is ringing) This leaves me with two questions and a suggestion for Microsoft: 1. How can I identify the fields that ARE indexed? 2. Is there a way to add fields to those indexed? Suggestion: I can dial a phone number from inside a contact record, please add the ability for Outlook to pick up the caller ID and tell me who is calling. Thanks "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" wrote: When you examine the fields that IS indexes, you will note that "Business Phone 2" is not among them. You use Advanced Find for fields that IS does not index. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "GWizz" wrote in message news ![]() I use Windows Search 4.0 with Outlook 2007 to look up contact phone numbers. This has been a great tool to allow me to look up a caller ID numbers and find the associated contact in my address book. But I have found that phone numbers in the "Business phone 2" field seem to be invisible to Windows search. The problem occurs with all contacts in my address book. The number is there in the "Business Phone 2" field, but Windows Search cannot find it.I have painfully rebuild the index, yet WS still cannot find any numbers listed in the "Business Phone 2" field. Here's what I use this search for... 1. My phone rings 2. I quickly look at the displayed phone number on my caller ID. 3. If there is no name, I enter the last four digits into the search window in Outlook contacts. 4. Before the fourth ring, the search results show me all contacts with those four digits in one of the phone numbers, and I know who's calling. But this doesn't work if the phone number is in the "Business phone 2" field. WHY NOT? Is there a way to make this work? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Outlook 2003 can the Phone numbers "labels" be customized | samklein | Outlook - Using Contacts | 1 | August 21st 08 09:40 PM |
in "phone list" view can't write the "business address street" fie | stalios | Outlook - Using Contacts | 1 | July 7th 08 11:08 PM |
Outlook 2003 Prepending "+1" to Contacts' Phone Numbers | Marks70 | Outlook - Using Contacts | 2 | August 3rd 07 05:02 PM |
Sorting Phone Numbers in individual contact "cards" | Jay | Outlook - Using Contacts | 0 | October 5th 06 06:14 PM |
move phone numbers from company field to business field | Tyson | Outlook and VBA | 3 | June 9th 06 06:38 PM |