![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am in the planning stage of setting up the client workstations in my office
to use public folders. (A feature of our Exchange server that has gone unused for too long!) One of the uses for this will be multiple shared contact lists, and I am trying to figure out the best way to accomplish this. I know that a workable method is to configure each client by opening the public folders, right-clicking each folder containing contact items, and checking the box that says show folder as an Address Book. But what I want to accomplish is being able to have one parent folder, list each individual folder as a subfolder, and configure it once on each client to automatically add any new subfolders. The goal of course is to set it up so that we can add new contact lists and have them automatically appear in everyone's address books. Also, ideally, I would like the parent folder to not show up in the address books. Any advice on how best to accomplish this is appreciated. Thanks, Jason Samuels |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My advice is that you should avoid making many Contacts folders and rather
use Categories to separate different "types" of contacts. Regards Judy Gleeson MVP Outlook www.judygleeson.com www.deskdoctors.com Are you sick of bad email practice? Get a copy of my paper "Implementing Email Policy" from the Desk Doctors website. "Jason" wrote in message ... I am in the planning stage of setting up the client workstations in my office to use public folders. (A feature of our Exchange server that has gone unused for too long!) One of the uses for this will be multiple shared contact lists, and I am trying to figure out the best way to accomplish this. I know that a workable method is to configure each client by opening the public folders, right-clicking each folder containing contact items, and checking the box that says show folder as an Address Book. But what I want to accomplish is being able to have one parent folder, list each individual folder as a subfolder, and configure it once on each client to automatically add any new subfolders. The goal of course is to set it up so that we can add new contact lists and have them automatically appear in everyone's address books. Also, ideally, I would like the parent folder to not show up in the address books. Any advice on how best to accomplish this is appreciated. Thanks, Jason Samuels |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow, hadn't thought of that!
You've got me going down an entirely different path and I'm trying to wrap my head around this now. We can use categories to segment within one contact folder - that way everyone has access and the metadata can be used to assign single contacts to multiple categories without duplicating them. I like that idea! Then the issue becomes how people see them by category. I'm looking at doing that by going into views and checking the box that says Only show views created for this folder. Then I can create the custom views - first one being all contacts grouped by category, then individual business card views filtered by category. As far as people being able to click "To" and select a group to send to - setting up a distribution list for each category should do the trick. In theory I think that'll work, but have been stymied in the past by Outlook responding one way for me as the folder owner - and another way on the client workstations. How does it sound to you? My key consideration here is I have to make it user friendly. The staff in my office get easily frustrated by technology - and new procedures that require too many steps won't fly. Thanks again, Jason "Judy Gleeson (MVP Outlook)" wrote: My advice is that you should avoid making many Contacts folders and rather use Categories to separate different "types" of contacts. Regards Judy Gleeson MVP Outlook www.judygleeson.com www.deskdoctors.com Are you sick of bad email practice? Get a copy of my paper "Implementing Email Policy" from the Desk Doctors website. "Jason" wrote in message ... I am in the planning stage of setting up the client workstations in my office to use public folders. (A feature of our Exchange server that has gone unused for too long!) One of the uses for this will be multiple shared contact lists, and I am trying to figure out the best way to accomplish this. I know that a workable method is to configure each client by opening the public folders, right-clicking each folder containing contact items, and checking the box that says show folder as an Address Book. But what I want to accomplish is being able to have one parent folder, list each individual folder as a subfolder, and configure it once on each client to automatically add any new subfolders. The goal of course is to set it up so that we can add new contact lists and have them automatically appear in everyone's address books. Also, ideally, I would like the parent folder to not show up in the address books. Any advice on how best to accomplish this is appreciated. Thanks, Jason Samuels |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You are on the right track UNTILyou mention Distribution Lists. They are not
a good idea and unnecessary. If you make those filtered views, you just select all, right click, new message. Or better still, select all and mailmerge to them. Can't do that with a DL. -- Regards Judy Gleeson MVP Outlook www.judygleeson.com www.deskdoctors.com Are you sick of bad email practice? Get a copy of my paper "Implementing Email Policy" from the Desk Doctors website. "Jason" wrote in message ... Wow, hadn't thought of that! You've got me going down an entirely different path and I'm trying to wrap my head around this now. We can use categories to segment within one contact folder - that way everyone has access and the metadata can be used to assign single contacts to multiple categories without duplicating them. I like that idea! Then the issue becomes how people see them by category. I'm looking at doing that by going into views and checking the box that says Only show views created for this folder. Then I can create the custom views - first one being all contacts grouped by category, then individual business card views filtered by category. As far as people being able to click "To" and select a group to send to - setting up a distribution list for each category should do the trick. In theory I think that'll work, but have been stymied in the past by Outlook responding one way for me as the folder owner - and another way on the client workstations. How does it sound to you? My key consideration here is I have to make it user friendly. The staff in my office get easily frustrated by technology - and new procedures that require too many steps won't fly. Thanks again, Jason "Judy Gleeson (MVP Outlook)" wrote: My advice is that you should avoid making many Contacts folders and rather use Categories to separate different "types" of contacts. Regards Judy Gleeson MVP Outlook www.judygleeson.com www.deskdoctors.com Are you sick of bad email practice? Get a copy of my paper "Implementing Email Policy" from the Desk Doctors website. "Jason" wrote in message ... I am in the planning stage of setting up the client workstations in my office to use public folders. (A feature of our Exchange server that has gone unused for too long!) One of the uses for this will be multiple shared contact lists, and I am trying to figure out the best way to accomplish this. I know that a workable method is to configure each client by opening the public folders, right-clicking each folder containing contact items, and checking the box that says show folder as an Address Book. But what I want to accomplish is being able to have one parent folder, list each individual folder as a subfolder, and configure it once on each client to automatically add any new subfolders. The goal of course is to set it up so that we can add new contact lists and have them automatically appear in everyone's address books. Also, ideally, I would like the parent folder to not show up in the address books. Any advice on how best to accomplish this is appreciated. Thanks, Jason Samuels |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't get why Distribution Lists aren't a good idea.
In this small office, most of my co-workers are pretty resistant to changing technology - and it is absolutely essential to make it as user friendly as possible. They are not going catch onto this by having to go into the folder list, public folders, contacts, filtered view, select all, right click, create, new message to contact. That's too many steps and just won't work. My co-workers want to be in their e-mail (where they're comfortable), click New, and click To. If they can feel accomplished with that, then some might venture into the contacts folder and learn more about how it's structured. So my original method to structure this was to create individual folders for each group we need. Such as this: http://www.ncfr.org/images/pic1-MSForum-20081216.JPG I posted to this forum looking for a solution that could automatically propogate new groups to all of the users. Such as, is it possible to have one directories folder with subfolders that get added automatically? Instead though you showed me another way, putting one directory folder in and organizing contacts by categories. I like this idea, because it seems like a more efficient way of managing things. But then those customized views I'm setting up are only available if people venture into the contacts folder. When they click New and To, all they're seeing is one directory folder and all of the contacts. Is there any way to make the filtered views appear there? Or even to add Category as a column there? Because otherwise, Distribution Lists based on the categories can be setup to appear at the top - like so: http://www.ncfr.org/images/pic2-MSForum-20081216.JPG In terms of striking a balance between usability and managability, I don't see why this is a bad idea. What am I missing here? "Judy Gleeson (MVP Outlook)" wrote: You are on the right track UNTILyou mention Distribution Lists. They are not a good idea and unnecessary. If you make those filtered views, you just select all, right click, new message. Or better still, select all and mailmerge to them. Can't do that with a DL. -- Regards Judy Gleeson MVP Outlook www.judygleeson.com www.deskdoctors.com Are you sick of bad email practice? Get a copy of my paper "Implementing Email Policy" from the Desk Doctors website. "Jason" wrote in message ... Wow, hadn't thought of that! You've got me going down an entirely different path and I'm trying to wrap my head around this now. We can use categories to segment within one contact folder - that way everyone has access and the metadata can be used to assign single contacts to multiple categories without duplicating them. I like that idea! Then the issue becomes how people see them by category. I'm looking at doing that by going into views and checking the box that says Only show views created for this folder. Then I can create the custom views - first one being all contacts grouped by category, then individual business card views filtered by category. As far as people being able to click "To" and select a group to send to - setting up a distribution list for each category should do the trick. In theory I think that'll work, but have been stymied in the past by Outlook responding one way for me as the folder owner - and another way on the client workstations. How does it sound to you? My key consideration here is I have to make it user friendly. The staff in my office get easily frustrated by technology - and new procedures that require too many steps won't fly. Thanks again, Jason "Judy Gleeson (MVP Outlook)" wrote: My advice is that you should avoid making many Contacts folders and rather use Categories to separate different "types" of contacts. Regards Judy Gleeson MVP Outlook www.judygleeson.com www.deskdoctors.com Are you sick of bad email practice? Get a copy of my paper "Implementing Email Policy" from the Desk Doctors website. "Jason" wrote in message ... I am in the planning stage of setting up the client workstations in my office to use public folders. (A feature of our Exchange server that has gone unused for too long!) One of the uses for this will be multiple shared contact lists, and I am trying to figure out the best way to accomplish this. I know that a workable method is to configure each client by opening the public folders, right-clicking each folder containing contact items, and checking the box that says show folder as an Address Book. But what I want to accomplish is being able to have one parent folder, list each individual folder as a subfolder, and configure it once on each client to automatically add any new subfolders. The goal of course is to set it up so that we can add new contact lists and have them automatically appear in everyone's address books. Also, ideally, I would like the parent folder to not show up in the address books. Any advice on how best to accomplish this is appreciated. Thanks, Jason Samuels |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DLs are well known to be unstable.
You cannot do a merged email or letter or labels to a DL. Read some of Russ Valentine MVP Outlook's posts about DLs. Regards Judy Gleeson MVP Outlook www.judygleeson.com www.deskdoctors.com Are you sick of bad email practice? Get a copy of my paper "Implementing Email Policy" from the Desk Doctors website. "Jason" wrote in message ... I don't get why Distribution Lists aren't a good idea. In this small office, most of my co-workers are pretty resistant to changing technology - and it is absolutely essential to make it as user friendly as possible. They are not going catch onto this by having to go into the folder list, public folders, contacts, filtered view, select all, right click, create, new message to contact. That's too many steps and just won't work. My co-workers want to be in their e-mail (where they're comfortable), click New, and click To. If they can feel accomplished with that, then some might venture into the contacts folder and learn more about how it's structured. So my original method to structure this was to create individual folders for each group we need. Such as this: http://www.ncfr.org/images/pic1-MSForum-20081216.JPG I posted to this forum looking for a solution that could automatically propogate new groups to all of the users. Such as, is it possible to have one directories folder with subfolders that get added automatically? Instead though you showed me another way, putting one directory folder in and organizing contacts by categories. I like this idea, because it seems like a more efficient way of managing things. But then those customized views I'm setting up are only available if people venture into the contacts folder. When they click New and To, all they're seeing is one directory folder and all of the contacts. Is there any way to make the filtered views appear there? Or even to add Category as a column there? Because otherwise, Distribution Lists based on the categories can be setup to appear at the top - like so: http://www.ncfr.org/images/pic2-MSForum-20081216.JPG In terms of striking a balance between usability and managability, I don't see why this is a bad idea. What am I missing here? "Judy Gleeson (MVP Outlook)" wrote: You are on the right track UNTILyou mention Distribution Lists. They are not a good idea and unnecessary. If you make those filtered views, you just select all, right click, new message. Or better still, select all and mailmerge to them. Can't do that with a DL. -- Regards Judy Gleeson MVP Outlook www.judygleeson.com www.deskdoctors.com Are you sick of bad email practice? Get a copy of my paper "Implementing Email Policy" from the Desk Doctors website. "Jason" wrote in message ... Wow, hadn't thought of that! You've got me going down an entirely different path and I'm trying to wrap my head around this now. We can use categories to segment within one contact folder - that way everyone has access and the metadata can be used to assign single contacts to multiple categories without duplicating them. I like that idea! Then the issue becomes how people see them by category. I'm looking at doing that by going into views and checking the box that says Only show views created for this folder. Then I can create the custom views - first one being all contacts grouped by category, then individual business card views filtered by category. As far as people being able to click "To" and select a group to send to - setting up a distribution list for each category should do the trick. In theory I think that'll work, but have been stymied in the past by Outlook responding one way for me as the folder owner - and another way on the client workstations. How does it sound to you? My key consideration here is I have to make it user friendly. The staff in my office get easily frustrated by technology - and new procedures that require too many steps won't fly. Thanks again, Jason "Judy Gleeson (MVP Outlook)" wrote: My advice is that you should avoid making many Contacts folders and rather use Categories to separate different "types" of contacts. Regards Judy Gleeson MVP Outlook www.judygleeson.com www.deskdoctors.com Are you sick of bad email practice? Get a copy of my paper "Implementing Email Policy" from the Desk Doctors website. "Jason" wrote in message ... I am in the planning stage of setting up the client workstations in my office to use public folders. (A feature of our Exchange server that has gone unused for too long!) One of the uses for this will be multiple shared contact lists, and I am trying to figure out the best way to accomplish this. I know that a workable method is to configure each client by opening the public folders, right-clicking each folder containing contact items, and checking the box that says show folder as an Address Book. But what I want to accomplish is being able to have one parent folder, list each individual folder as a subfolder, and configure it once on each client to automatically add any new subfolders. The goal of course is to set it up so that we can add new contact lists and have them automatically appear in everyone's address books. Also, ideally, I would like the parent folder to not show up in the address books. Any advice on how best to accomplish this is appreciated. Thanks, Jason Samuels |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I see the posts about how they are unstable, thanks for the heads up!
I'm going to just go with the original plan to create individual folders for each group. It's not the most manageable solution, but simplicity for the end user is a greater concern. Thanks for your input! Jason "Judy Gleeson (MVP Outlook)" wrote: DLs are well known to be unstable. You cannot do a merged email or letter or labels to a DL. Read some of Russ Valentine MVP Outlook's posts about DLs. Regards Judy Gleeson MVP Outlook www.judygleeson.com www.deskdoctors.com Are you sick of bad email practice? Get a copy of my paper "Implementing Email Policy" from the Desk Doctors website. "Jason" wrote in message ... I don't get why Distribution Lists aren't a good idea. In this small office, most of my co-workers are pretty resistant to changing technology - and it is absolutely essential to make it as user friendly as possible. They are not going catch onto this by having to go into the folder list, public folders, contacts, filtered view, select all, right click, create, new message to contact. That's too many steps and just won't work. My co-workers want to be in their e-mail (where they're comfortable), click New, and click To. If they can feel accomplished with that, then some might venture into the contacts folder and learn more about how it's structured. So my original method to structure this was to create individual folders for each group we need. Such as this: http://www.ncfr.org/images/pic1-MSForum-20081216.JPG I posted to this forum looking for a solution that could automatically propogate new groups to all of the users. Such as, is it possible to have one directories folder with subfolders that get added automatically? Instead though you showed me another way, putting one directory folder in and organizing contacts by categories. I like this idea, because it seems like a more efficient way of managing things. But then those customized views I'm setting up are only available if people venture into the contacts folder. When they click New and To, all they're seeing is one directory folder and all of the contacts. Is there any way to make the filtered views appear there? Or even to add Category as a column there? Because otherwise, Distribution Lists based on the categories can be setup to appear at the top - like so: http://www.ncfr.org/images/pic2-MSForum-20081216.JPG In terms of striking a balance between usability and managability, I don't see why this is a bad idea. What am I missing here? "Judy Gleeson (MVP Outlook)" wrote: You are on the right track UNTILyou mention Distribution Lists. They are not a good idea and unnecessary. If you make those filtered views, you just select all, right click, new message. Or better still, select all and mailmerge to them. Can't do that with a DL. -- Regards Judy Gleeson MVP Outlook www.judygleeson.com www.deskdoctors.com Are you sick of bad email practice? Get a copy of my paper "Implementing Email Policy" from the Desk Doctors website. "Jason" wrote in message ... Wow, hadn't thought of that! You've got me going down an entirely different path and I'm trying to wrap my head around this now. We can use categories to segment within one contact folder - that way everyone has access and the metadata can be used to assign single contacts to multiple categories without duplicating them. I like that idea! Then the issue becomes how people see them by category. I'm looking at doing that by going into views and checking the box that says Only show views created for this folder. Then I can create the custom views - first one being all contacts grouped by category, then individual business card views filtered by category. As far as people being able to click "To" and select a group to send to - setting up a distribution list for each category should do the trick. In theory I think that'll work, but have been stymied in the past by Outlook responding one way for me as the folder owner - and another way on the client workstations. How does it sound to you? My key consideration here is I have to make it user friendly. The staff in my office get easily frustrated by technology - and new procedures that require too many steps won't fly. Thanks again, Jason "Judy Gleeson (MVP Outlook)" wrote: My advice is that you should avoid making many Contacts folders and rather use Categories to separate different "types" of contacts. Regards Judy Gleeson MVP Outlook www.judygleeson.com www.deskdoctors.com Are you sick of bad email practice? Get a copy of my paper "Implementing Email Policy" from the Desk Doctors website. "Jason" wrote in message ... I am in the planning stage of setting up the client workstations in my office to use public folders. (A feature of our Exchange server that has gone unused for too long!) One of the uses for this will be multiple shared contact lists, and I am trying to figure out the best way to accomplish this. I know that a workable method is to configure each client by opening the public folders, right-clicking each folder containing contact items, and checking the box that says show folder as an Address Book. But what I want to accomplish is being able to have one parent folder, list each individual folder as a subfolder, and configure it once on each client to automatically add any new subfolders. The goal of course is to set it up so that we can add new contact lists and have them automatically appear in everyone's address books. Also, ideally, I would like the parent folder to not show up in the address books. Any advice on how best to accomplish this is appreciated. Thanks, Jason Samuels |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Outlook Address Book and Exchange Public Folders | WHGeorge | Outlook - Using Contacts | 4 | September 14th 07 10:37 AM |
custom forms without public folders and client installation | [email protected] | Outlook - Using Forms | 1 | April 17th 07 04:34 AM |
Address Book Contacts and public folders | TomTom | Outlook - Using Contacts | 3 | January 15th 07 09:05 PM |
shared contacts using public folders or address lists? | J Miller | Outlook - General Queries | 1 | December 2nd 06 06:59 PM |
Public Folders - Search Subfolders is Greyed Out | Chris Briant | Outlook - General Queries | 1 | July 19th 06 03:59 PM |