A Microsoft Outlook email forum. Outlook Banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Outlook Banter forum » Microsoft Outlook Email Newsgroups » Outlook - Using Forms
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Merging From Outlook 2003 Using Form or Folder Level Fields



 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 2nd 10, 09:52 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook.program_forms
SRM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default Merging From Outlook 2003 Using Form or Folder Level Fields

I'm using Outlook 2003 and using a custom form. In this custom form I
have the same item level fields as I do in the form level fields. I
have no folder level fields.

I want to be able to merge starting with Outlook and selecting a Word
document to merge into.

The only way I can see that this will work is with folder level
fields. Word does not see item level fields nor does it see form level
fields for merging. Am I correct in this assumption?

What I think I need to do is for each form level field I need to
create the equivalent folder level field. Basically duplicating each
field at the folder level that I already have at the form level. Is
there a better option?

The fields that I had already created based off the original contact
form (via the form designer) appear in the form and item level fields,
but not the folder level fields. However, if I add a new field using
the form designer (basically modify the form), that field by default
ends up as a folder level field and not a form level field. It seems
the results differ based on when you add the field which I can't
figure out why.

So my questions are why do fields appear in different levels based on
when they are added, and is there any way to get the form levels
fields to also be folder level fields without recreating them?

Thanks

Shawn
Ads
  #2  
Old March 3rd 10, 03:50 PM posted to microsoft.public.outlook.program_forms
Ken Slovak - [MVP - Outlook]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,848
Default Merging From Outlook 2003 Using Form or Folder Level Fields

The pre-programmed merges started from Word or from Outlook will not use
custom fields. For that you need to completely program the merge yourself
using code. That's the way it's always been.

For an explanation of form fields and where they are located and what
effects that has look at the forms information at www.outlookcode.com.

--
Ken Slovak
[MVP - Outlook]
http://www.slovaktech.com
Author: Professional Programming Outlook 2007.
Reminder Manager, Extended Reminders, Attachment Options.
http://www.slovaktech.com/products.htm


"SRM" wrote in message
...
I'm using Outlook 2003 and using a custom form. In this custom form I
have the same item level fields as I do in the form level fields. I
have no folder level fields.

I want to be able to merge starting with Outlook and selecting a Word
document to merge into.

The only way I can see that this will work is with folder level
fields. Word does not see item level fields nor does it see form level
fields for merging. Am I correct in this assumption?

What I think I need to do is for each form level field I need to
create the equivalent folder level field. Basically duplicating each
field at the folder level that I already have at the form level. Is
there a better option?

The fields that I had already created based off the original contact
form (via the form designer) appear in the form and item level fields,
but not the folder level fields. However, if I add a new field using
the form designer (basically modify the form), that field by default
ends up as a folder level field and not a form level field. It seems
the results differ based on when you add the field which I can't
figure out why.

So my questions are why do fields appear in different levels based on
when they are added, and is there any way to get the form levels
fields to also be folder level fields without recreating them?

Thanks

Shawn


  #3  
Old March 4th 10, 01:03 AM posted to microsoft.public.outlook.program_forms
SRM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default Merging From Outlook 2003 Using Form or Folder Level Fields

On Mar 3, 9:50*am, "Ken Slovak - [MVP - Outlook]"
wrote:
The pre-programmed merges started from Word or from Outlook will not use
custom fields. For that you need to completely program the merge yourself
using code. That's the way it's always been.

For an explanation of form fields and where they are located and what
effects that has look at the forms information atwww.outlookcode.com.

--
Ken Slovak
[MVP - Outlook]http://www.slovaktech.com
Author: Professional Programming Outlook 2007.
Reminder Manager, Extended Reminders, Attachment Options.http://www.slovaktech.com/products.htm

"SRM" wrote in message

...

I'm using Outlook 2003 and using a custom form. In this custom form I
have the same item level fields as I do in the form level fields. I
have no folder level fields.


I want to be able to merge starting with Outlook and selecting a Word
document to merge into.


The only way I can see that this will work is with folder level
fields. Word does not see item level fields nor does it see form level
fields for merging. Am I correct in this assumption?


What I think I need to do is for each form level field I need to
create the equivalent folder level field. Basically duplicating each
field at the folder level that I already have at the form level. Is
there a better option?


The fields that I had already created based off the original contact
form (via the form designer) appear in the form and item level fields,
but not the folder level fields. However, if I add a new field using
the form designer (basically modify the form), that field by default
ends up as a folder level field and not a form level field. *It seems
the results differ based on when you add the field which I can't
figure out why.


So my questions are why do fields appear in different levels based on
when they are added, and is there any way to get the form levels
fields to also be folder level fields without recreating them?


Thanks


Shawn


Ken:

Thanks. When I have fields at the folder level, Word does see those
custom fields (at the folder level) for a merge. I have added those
custom fields to my Word file to complete merges. I have been using
this format but recently had to update my PST file and lost all my
folder level fields. Am I miss-understanding your reply?

Concerning the fields, I have read through Sue's book and reviewed the
site. Unless I just plain missed it, I cannot find answers to the
questions I posted in those locations.

Thanks again for your help.
 




Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mail Merging My user-defiend fields GreenSaxo Outlook - Using Contacts 3 November 21st 07 12:06 PM
Outlook 2003 - form not showing fields Ynez Outlook - Using Forms 12 July 27th 07 12:49 PM
Creating Top Level Folder within Outlook 2003 Adrian Butler Outlook and VBA 1 April 24th 07 03:15 PM
Auto setting importance level on custom form ALF Outlook - Using Forms 1 September 15th 06 11:05 PM
Fields get created in folder, not in custom form kkarre Outlook - Using Forms 2 February 2nd 06 09:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 2.4.0
Copyright ©2004-2025 Outlook Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.