![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have been looking for this for a while now but have not found a clear
answer. Does anyone know what "valid" entries are for the Version and Form Number properties on a form? For example (Version): 1 1.1 1.1.1 1.1.1.1 Which, if any, of those are valid entries? Valid in the sense that if a form version 1.1.2 is cached on someone's machine and that same form, updated, and with version 1.1.3 is published to the OFL, Outlook on that machine would do an accurate compare on the version numbers and pull the new one? Does outlook correctly distinguish between 1.2 and 1.3? 1.2.1 and 1.2.2? Or can it only do the difference between 1 and 2? Same question for "Form Number" This is in regards to Outlook 2003. Thank you very very much Kelly Johnson |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anything you want to put in those properties will be reasonable. They are there for you to maintain your own system of versioning and numbering that you can see on the Help | About This Form dialog.
-- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "sublimese" wrote in message oups.com... I have been looking for this for a while now but have not found a clear answer. Does anyone know what "valid" entries are for the Version and Form Number properties on a form? For example (Version): 1 1.1 1.1.1 1.1.1.1 Which, if any, of those are valid entries? Valid in the sense that if a form version 1.1.2 is cached on someone's machine and that same form, updated, and with version 1.1.3 is published to the OFL, Outlook on that machine would do an accurate compare on the version numbers and pull the new one? Does outlook correctly distinguish between 1.2 and 1.3? 1.2.1 and 1.2.2? Or can it only do the difference between 1 and 2? Same question for "Form Number" This is in regards to Outlook 2003. Thank you very very much Kelly Johnson |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sue,
Thank you very much for your reply. Your reply indicates that "Version" and "Form Number" are ONLY there for personal organization and have no bearing on Outlook determining if it has the latest version of a form. Is this correct? Thank you very much Kelly Johnson |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Correct. Outlook will happily use version 10.0 as the latest version if it was published after version 11.0
-- Sue Mosher, Outlook MVP Author of Configuring Microsoft Outlook 2003 http://www.turtleflock.com/olconfig/index.htm and Microsoft Outlook Programming - Jumpstart for Administrators, Power Users, and Developers http://www.outlookcode.com/jumpstart.aspx "sublimese" wrote in message oups.com... Sue, Thank you very much for your reply. Your reply indicates that "Version" and "Form Number" are ONLY there for personal organization and have no bearing on Outlook determining if it has the latest version of a form. Is this correct? Thank you very much Kelly Johnson |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sue,
Thank you very much Kelly Johnson |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to make an old version of Office look like the new version? | beefer | Outlook - Installation | 0 | February 24th 06 10:59 PM |
BCM Max number of entries | Ben | Outlook - Using Contacts | 0 | February 14th 06 01:34 PM |
Should I deleat trail version and install real version ? | Trail Outlook | Outlook - Installation | 0 | January 27th 06 03:47 PM |
Maximum Number of Entries per day | KimDale75 | Outlook - Calandaring | 0 | January 18th 06 04:58 PM |
How do I count the number of entries in a view? | bedurfey | Outlook - Using Contacts | 3 | January 11th 06 11:21 PM |