![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is Extended MAPI hard to use? We're having too many problems with using the
Outlook object model to send & receive email in a server type application. CDO is mentioned in the Outlook Security template so I assume shifting to CDO wouldn't help that aspect - we'd still need the Exchange admin user to create the templates. Redemption looks like a good system, just not sure how acceptable it is in a corporate environment. Thanks, Rob. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If the code is running server side then CDO would be installed if the
Exchange management tools are installed and server side CDO 1.21 is not subject to the security. Only client side CDO (from the Office CD) is subject to security. The two should never be mixed. Just as you never install Outlook on your Exchange server you don't install CDO client on the server either. Extended MAPI can only be programmed using C++ or Delphi. That's hurdle #1. It's also not object oriented and is hard to learn and use. Personally I use Redemption in my coding. -- Ken Slovak [MVP - Outlook] http://www.slovaktech.com Author: Absolute Beginner's Guide to Microsoft Office Outlook 2003 Reminder Manager, Extended Reminders, Attachment Options http://www.slovaktech.com/products.htm "Rob Nicholson" wrote in message ... Is Extended MAPI hard to use? We're having too many problems with using the Outlook object model to send & receive email in a server type application. CDO is mentioned in the Outlook Security template so I assume shifting to CDO wouldn't help that aspect - we'd still need the Exchange admin user to create the templates. Redemption looks like a good system, just not sure how acceptable it is in a corporate environment. Thanks, Rob. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If the code is running server side then CDO would be installed if the
Exchange management tools are installed and server side CDO 1.21 is not subject to the security. Only client side CDO (from the Office CD) is subject to security. Just to get my head around this - are you saying there are two flavours of CDO? One that's designed to run on a server and the other on a client PC? Will the Server CDO flavour only install on a Windows Server OS or can it install on Windows XP? The reason I ask is that we often trial our server on a normal PC before moving it to a service in the back office. Extended MAPI can only be programmed using C++ or Delphi. That's hurdle #1. It's also not object oriented and is hard to learn and use. Personally I use Redemption in my coding. Well C++ wouldn't be totally out of the window but prefer not to. How does Redemption resolve the security issue - does it use some other mechanism to handle email? Thanks, Rob. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, there currently are 2 flavors of CDO 1.21, server and client. Only the
client version on the Office CD's is security limited. Due to the differences in the underlying MAPI support libraries they use they can't be mixed. Server side CDO won't run correctly if installed on an Outlook client machine, it might even break Outlook. Same on the other side. AFAIK it's mostly a thing that's related to Exchange/Outlook, not the exact version of Windows. Redemption does it's magic and avoids the Outlook security because it's a COM wrapper for Extended MAPI stuff. So it doesn't use the Outlook object model or CDO libraries at all. Dmitry, the author has given us a subset of the things you can do with Extended MAPI but with the COM wrapper Redemption can be used from any language that can work with COM (VB, VB.NET, C#, even VBScript). Another nice thing with the latest versions of Redemption is that it now essentially replaces CDO. In fact all my major applications that used to use CDO now have been rewritten to use RDO objects from Redemption. With Stores and Sessions and various other things I never have to use CDO 1.21 code again. -- Ken Slovak [MVP - Outlook] http://www.slovaktech.com Author: Absolute Beginner's Guide to Microsoft Office Outlook 2003 Reminder Manager, Extended Reminders, Attachment Options http://www.slovaktech.com/products.htm "Rob Nicholson" wrote in message ... If the code is running server side then CDO would be installed if the Exchange management tools are installed and server side CDO 1.21 is not subject to the security. Only client side CDO (from the Office CD) is subject to security. Just to get my head around this - are you saying there are two flavours of CDO? One that's designed to run on a server and the other on a client PC? Will the Server CDO flavour only install on a Windows Server OS or can it install on Windows XP? The reason I ask is that we often trial our server on a normal PC before moving it to a service in the back office. Extended MAPI can only be programmed using C++ or Delphi. That's hurdle #1. It's also not object oriented and is hard to learn and use. Personally I use Redemption in my coding. Well C++ wouldn't be totally out of the window but prefer not to. How does Redemption resolve the security issue - does it use some other mechanism to handle email? Thanks, Rob. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Redemption does it's magic and avoids the Outlook security because it's a
COM wrapper for Extended MAPI stuff. So it doesn't use the Outlook object model or CDO libraries at all. Dmitry, the author has given us a subset of the things you can do with Extended MAPI but with the COM wrapper Redemption can be used from any language that can work with COM (VB, VB.NET, C#, even VBScript). Thanks for this - happier with Redemption now I know I it works under the hood. We will check it out. Cheers, Rob. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Am Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:11:28 -0000 schrieb Rob Nicholson:
In addition to Ken: Redemption helps you saving a lot of time and works like a charm - also in corporate environments, of course! -- Viele Gruesse / Best regards Michael Bauer - MVP Outlook Is Extended MAPI hard to use? We're having too many problems with using the Outlook object model to send & receive email in a server type application. CDO is mentioned in the Outlook Security template so I assume shifting to CDO wouldn't help that aspect - we'd still need the Exchange admin user to create the templates. Redemption looks like a good system, just not sure how acceptable it is in a corporate environment. Thanks, Rob. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In addition to Ken: Redemption helps you saving a lot of time and works
like a charm - also in corporate environments, of course! We've heard and read good things about Redemption so we're going to have a more serious look at it. It looks like it mirrors a lot of the Outlook objects and methods so converting existing Outlook code to use Redemption looks reasonably painless. Cheers, Rob. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Only when i forward emails with attachements "550 relaying mail to" [domain] "is not allowed" | Alchemy | Outlook - General Queries | 4 | March 8th 06 11:47 PM |
Mapi32.dll is an invalid extended MAPI library | Mike Dormante | Outlook - General Queries | 1 | January 20th 06 03:26 PM |
Gettin Emails off of "other" hard drive. | Michelle | Outlook Express | 6 | January 15th 06 07:44 AM |
In Table View can I group by "Date" instead of "Start" | KLM | Outlook - Calandaring | 1 | January 11th 06 04:52 AM |